Follow Us on Pinterest Watch Us on Youtube Follow Us on Facebook

Courses and Workshops

Starting a Successful New Ecovillage or Intentional Community Register

creating a life togetherWorkshop overview:

    The workshop includes visual/verbal presentations with drawings, a slideshow and short videos, small-group discussions and exercises, musical skits, and the “Ecovillage/Intentional Community Clinic,” in which participants present their community projects and Diana and the other participants comment and make suggestions.

Video sample:

Diana’s presentation at Global Ecovillage Network’s 20th Anniversary Conference, Findhorn Foundation in Scotland, 2015:  Three Aspects of Healthy, Thriving Community (1st 11 minutes)

Workshop Details:

First day: Three aspects of a healthy, thriving community. Eight antidotes to “structural conflict.  Various ways communities organize themselves. The 19 Steps – how community founders typically start successful communities. “The Timeline Game” — organizing the steps of starting a successful new community. “The Theoretical-Visionary/Community Experience Scale” (how communities change over time). Musical skit: “That’s Not Community!” Your community’s Mission & Purpose. “The Community Board Game” — relationship of membership process/mission/self-governance. A clear, thorough membership process.

5 SocWks Montr 2014 grp 72 7 copy

People tend to really enjoy Diana’s workshops.

Second day: Self-governance & decision-making. Why not classic consensus? Overview: N St. Consensus Method. Overview: Sociocracy. How communities own land, find land. (Financing land is covered on 3rd workshop day.) Overview: Zoning, neighbors, tiny homes, homes on wheels. Overview: legal entities for co-owning land, education programs, & more. Using multiple legal entities. Overview: internal community economies, capital and operations budgets, social enterprises in community. Community labor issues: requirements, contributions, tracking. Reducing interpersonal conflict from ineffective governance, accountability issues, skilled & hurtful communication. Assessing “Social Capital.”  Working effectively with challenging group members. Recommending NVC & Restorative Circles. Overview: Restorative Circles.

HH Wks 40 Slct Roles skit 4 72 7 copy

Participants hamming it up with one of the workshop’s musical skits.

Third day: More on reducing interpersonal conflict. Special Guest, Jonah Mesritz, founder of Emerald Village Observatory near Vista, and Realtor specializing in helping intentional communities find land, on innovative ways to finance land purchase. “Ecovillage & Intentional Community Clinic”: We assess and offer suggestions for participants’ forming and already-existing community projects.

Comments about Diana’s work, presentations, and this workshop:

One-minute video of Kevin Bayuk, founder Urban Permaculture Institute, San Francisco Bay Area, on Diana’s work:

“Your presentation was one of the best I’ve seen. . . . down-to-earth, humble, extremely knowledgeable, realistic, practical, insightful, and inspiring (and funny).” 

    —Laura Allen, 2015. Los Angeles Eco-Village; author, The Water-Wise Home

“I love the way you teach — supporting the questioner and question, being totally honest, and keeping a smile and positive, hopeful attitude about everything.” 

    —Dave Henson, 2011. Co-founder, OAEC Community, California

“You’re truly a master at taking complex material and making it simple. The way you engage participants is brilliant.” 

     —Gaya Erlandson, 2012. Lotus Lodge Community, North Carolina

“You are a sparkling trainer and a joy to work with. L.A. Eco-Village was energized for a year after your workshop.”  

      —Lois Arkin, 2006. Co-founder, Los Angeles Eco-Village


Location Terra Corazon
11945 Mesa Verde Drive
Valley Center CA

Hosted By San Diego Sustainable Living Institute

Diana Leafe Christian
October 7, 2017 - October 9, 2017 Terra Corazon Terra Corazon
9:00 AM - 5:00 PM - 5:00 PM
Early Bird $250.00
General Admission $350.00
Group Rate $200.00
Both 3 - Day Classes $200.00

Sociocracy for Intentional Communities and Member-Led Groups Register

The three-day introductory workshop covers the basics of Sociocracy and will enable your group to start a study circle or implementation circle to learn more about Socciocracy and begin implementing it in your group, assuming that your group decides to try it. Groups don’t usually decide to replace their current governance and decision-making method with Sociocracy, but rather decide to try Sociocracy for a period of time such as 18 months to two years and see how they like it.creating a life together

Sociocracy tends to to work well in a community when:

(1) people understand it well (2) all members understand it, and (3) the group all of its eight parts.

It tends not to work well when:

(1) people understand it only partially, (2) some members understand it and others don’t, or (3) the group uses some but not all of its seven parts. Or — the worst — if the community misunderstands Sociocracy by viewing it through the lens of consensus, and inadvertently creates a Sociocracy-consensus hybrid. This doesn’t work as well as either Sociocracy or consensus and tends to generate confusion and frustration. 

More about learning and using Sociocracy well:

(1) The group understands the need for ongoing training or periodic reviews, such as with an ongoing Sociocracy study group and/or an in-house coach. Or they have in-person or online consultations with a Sociocracy trainer. They use an outside Sociocracy facilitator when they can.

(2) The group makes sure all members learn Sociocracy — especially new incoming people. The community doesn’t assume new folks will just “pick it up” by attending meetings; rather, training in Sociocracy is provided for new members before they have full decision rights in meetings Without training people tend to misinterpret Sociocracy through the lens of whatever decision-making method they are most familiar with, often consensus.

(3) Group members who do not or will not learn Sociocracy for whatever reason nevertheless agree to support the group in using it, perhaps by signing a written agreement saying this and saying they promise to learn Sociocracy as soon as they can. And they agree not to interrupt or undermine the facilitator’s work of leading circle members through Sociocracy’s various meeting processes.

(4) Since the eight main parts of Sociocracy work together synergistically to provide efficient governance and effective meetings, the group uses all seven parts.

More about Sociocracy:

Sociocracy has many parts, but in my opinion, the following eight parts are the minimum needed to provide checks and balances against any potential abuses of power. These seven parts work together synergistically, each mutually benefitting and reinforcing the others: (1) “double-linked” circles, (2) clear aims (ongoing objectives) for each circle, (3) feedback loops built into every proposal — and four meeting processes — (4) consent decision-making, (5) proposal-forming, (6) selecting people for roles (elections,) (7) role- improvement feedback, and (8) consenting to circle members). Here’s a description of each:

(1) Double-linked circles. Semi-autonomous, self-organized “circles” (committees, teams), organize work tasks, including administrative tasks and physical labor tasks. Each circle provides a specific, concrete function for the community; for example, Membership Circle, Finance Circle, Land Use Circle, and so on. Most circles are relatively small, with perhaps four to eight members.

A central circle, called a “General Circle,” coordinates all the other circles determining their areas of responsibility, aims, and budgets. The General Circle also provides longer-term planning for the whole community — coordinating and overseeing the work of the other, more specific and focused circles.

“Double links” are two people who are each members of two different circles, and who convey information between the two circles. This ensures a direct, two-way flow of information circles, and helps all the various work areas of the community function smoothly and synergistically in relation with one another. 

(2) Domain and aims. Aims (ongoing objectives) are what the circle produces and provides for the community. The aims of a Finance Circle, for example, with the domain of financial management for the community, would be to provide financial services, including, the work of paying the community’s taxes, utility bills, insurance premiums, and so on, and invoicing and collecting dues and fees from members. The aims of a community’s Promotions Circle, with the domain of community promotions and advertising, would be to provide the services of promotions and advertising in order to inform and inspire potential visitors, neighbors, and the general public about its mission and activities, and its specific work could be creating and managing the community’s website, blog, online newsletter, brochures, tours for visitors, and other tasks. Again, Sociocracy is about organizing work, and for intentional communities, this means providing a clear, effective system for doing this — and with clear domains and aims, everyone knows what each circle is doing and why they’re doing it.

Aims are not goals, which have a beginning and end. Rather, aims are ongoing and continuous. Aims are crucial because when circle members make proposals, object to proposals, and resolve objections to proposals they do so based on how the proposal may or may not support the specific aims of their circle. 

(3) Feedback Loops. Engineers and inventors use the three steps of feedback loops to create and test their ideas. First they create a design or plan. Next they implement their design by creating a prototype in order to try out the design. And lastly they measure and evaluate the prototype in order to learn how it works in real-life circumstances. Then they may revise their design, based on what they learned in their measurements and evaluation, and create a new prototype.

Feedback loops are built into Sociocracy too, because the wording of every proposal includes criteria for how it will later be measured and evaluated for effectiveness after it is implemented, and dates of upcoming meetings in which these evaluations will occur. Criteria for measuring proposals can include “how much” and “how many” questions. Criteria for evaluation are more subjective, and might include questions such as “Do we like it?” “Is it working well?” “What do community members say about it?” and so on.

After each evaluation circle members can keep the implemented proposal as it is or change it as needed or even dismantle it (if possible). So when circle members are creating or considering a proposal, they know that, depending on the proposal, they may later be able to keep it, change it, or throw it out. Thus no proposal or decision has to be perfect, but only “good enough for now” and “safe enough to try.” This flexibility reduces the fear of making a mistake or of failing to create a “perfect” proposal where they’ve thought of everything. Because using feedback loops takes the pressure off circle members to “get it right,” meetings tend to be much more relaxed than when using consensus, since in consensus it is difficult to change a decision once it’s finally been decided. 

(4) Consent Decision-Making. This meeting process includes checking in with each person in the circle, called a “round.” After a round to answer clarifying questions and a round hear quick reactions, there’s a round to hear whether each circle member consent to the proposal or objects to it. Objections indicate the proposal needs more work. Circle members resolve objections by modifying the proposal and then doing another consent round. These two steps — consent rounds and modifying any objections — are alternated until there are no more objections — which means the circle has consented to the latest modification of the proposal.

When Consent Decision-Making is practiced correctly, no member of a circle can stop their circle from approving a proposal because the proposal violates the person’s own personal values or lifestyle choices. Objections to proposals are a necessary and desirable part of Consent Decision-Making and are not blocks or vetoes. As noted above, the checks and balances provided by the seven parts of Sociocracy — including that when a circle has clear aims no one can object for personal reasons, which helps prevent power abuses in decision making. Thus in Sociocracy there is no “personal blocking” or implied or actual “threats to block.”

(5) In Proposal-Forming, circle members draft one or more proposals about an issue that relates to the circle’s area of responsibility and aims.

(6) In Selecting People for Roles (elections), circle members choose people for specific roles in their circle, and their choices are based on the specific responsibilities and qualifications for each role rather than on whether or not they like the person or other personal reasons. Related to this is the process, Consenting to Circle Members.

(7) Consenting to Circle Members. People choose other members of their circle based on the person’s willingness and having enough time to do do the tasks of the circle, and their ability to work cooperatively.

(8) In Role-Improvement Feedback, circle members give feedback — what’s working well, what may need improvement — to other circle members relative to how they are fulfilling the specific responsibilities of the role. 

Location Terra Corazon
11945 Mesa Verde Drive
Valley Center CA

Hosted By San Diego Sustainable Living Institute

Diana Leafe Christian
October 14, 2017 - October 16, 2017 Terra Corazon Terra Corazon
9:00 AM - 5:00 PM - 5:00 PM
Early Bird
General Admission
Group $200.00
Both 3 - Day Classes $200.00

West Coast Communities Conference: Thriving, Not Just Surviving Fiscal Health in Community Register

Organized by SWICA – South West IC Alliance

And co-sponsored by the Fellowship for Intentional Community, Cohousing California and Terra Madre Gardens

Welcome to the 3rd Annual West Coast Communities Conference.  Taking off from last year’s subject of economic justice, we are organizing this year’s topics around the subject of equitable and sustainable income and affordablity.  We have workshops…

Some of the potential topics:

Financially feasible ways to start Community and ongoing affordability

Organizing for affordability in less able neighborhoods

Intentional Business (IB): Kinds of businesses that may be suitable with Intentional Community

A look at Worker Cooperatives (Collectives)

Fairness of equitable effort: Everyone pulling their own weight while respecting those less able

Balancing Intra (local) Economy and Extra (global) Economy

Alternative Trade Systems: LETS, TimeBank, HourWorld, etc.

Sources of Funding

Click here for Reservations

Call for Presenters:  Please see below for contact information.

Call for Volunteers:  Help make this year’s event even better.  There are several roles we can use help with.  People are needed for registration, volunteer coordination, website administration, among others.  Those who would like to get involved or for more information, please contact:

Contact Us: Conference Email; Conference FaceBook Page; South-West Intentional Community Alliance (SWICA) website; SWICA Email

Event organizers: Werner, Event Coordinator (949) 551-2800; Steve Fuji, SWICA Committee Head (505) 715-1418

Location Terra Madre Gardens
9928 Protea Gardens Rd
Escondido CA 92026

Hosted By South West Intentional Communities Alliance

Visit Website
Diana Leafe Christian
September 29, 2017 - October 1, 2017 Terra Madre Gardens Terra Madre Gardens
Registration $180.00